logo Digital Platform Knowledge Platform on Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights

Not a member? Register here. Forgot password? Reset here.
  • About Us
    • Membership
    • Participatory Grants
    • Communities of Practice
    • Become a Member
    • Contact us
  • Discover
    • Knowledge Product Library
    • SRHR Resource Library
    • Events
    • News
    • Jobs & Opportunities
    • SHIRIM/CRIM-KT
    • ARTchive
    • COVID Grants
 /  Resources  /  Improving the Measurement of Fertility Regulation Practices: Findings from Qualitative Research in Ghana

Improving the Measurement of Fertility Regulation Practices: Findings from Qualitative Research in Ghana

External Resource

27/03/2018 12:00 am

Share-Net Digital Platform

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
Improving the Measurement of Fertility Regulation Practices: Findings from Qualitative Research in Ghana

According to Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data, highly educated urban women in some West African countries simultaneously have low rates of both contraceptive use and fertility—suggesting that the DHS may not be capturing a complete picture of women’s contraceptive practices.

METHODS

Individual in-depth interviews and focus group discussions were conducted with a total of 48 women aged 18–49 in Accra, Ghana, who had at least a secondary education to explore their reproductive lives and relationships, and their views on and use of fertility regulation strategies. Data were analyzed using iterative thematic techniques.

RESULTS

Women commonly reported using combinations of contraceptive methods, including “counting days” (using a calendar and the date of one’s last menstrual period to estimate “unsafe” days—those on which the risk of conception is high), as well as withdrawal, condoms and frequent use of emergency contraceptive pills. Women described practicing “periodic contraception”: for example, counting days to determine unsafe days and practicing contraception ad hoc on such days. Method use combinations varied from cycle to cycle—forming a “mosaic” of method use combinations over time.

CONCLUSIONS

The fertility control strategies commonly reported by the study respondents—periodic contraception, and frequent use of traditional methods and emergency contraceptive pills—are likely not adequately captured in general surveys such as the DHS. Such surveys are also not well suited to measuring combinations of methods and mosaics of method combinations. New ways of capturing women’s fertility regulation practices should be considered, including additional survey items, new question modules and specialist studies.


Leave a Comment Cancel

You must Register or Login to post a comment.

Topic

  • Infertility

Tags

Download

Download PDF

Related Resources

Mother and Newborn Services in Jordan: Rapid Assessment of Health...

May 20, 2021

Breaking the Silence on Infertility

February 2, 2021

Focus on Abortion: Special Supplement

January 6, 2021

Focus on Abortion: Special Supplement

January 6, 2021

Toolkit for managing and improving the quality of SRHR services in...

December 8, 2020

mPower: Connecting Development with Technology

December 1, 2020

Subscribe to our email updates

Enter your details below to receive our monthly SRHR updates directly in your inbox

Our Newsletters

LAUNCH WEBINAR: Addressing the Overlooked SRHR Needs of People with Disabilities

03/06/2025 10:00 am
  • About
  • Contact
  • Become a member
  • Join our Mailing list
  • Privacy Policy
  • FAQs
© 2025 - The Share-Net International Digital Platform